New sustainable protein sources: consumers’ willingness to adopt insects as feed and food
AbstractThe aim of the study was to investigate the willingness of Italian consumers to adopt insects as part of animal and human diets. Furthermore, we evaluated the effect of information about the benefit of introducing insects into the diet on consumers' acceptance. The results showed that Italian consumers were clearly not ready to accept insects as food, whereas a major positive trend was observed regarding their use as feed. The principal factors affecting the Italian consumers’ readiness to adopt insects as food and feed were age, gender, cultural background and food neophobia. Information about the environmental and nutritional benefits of introducing insects as food had a marginal but positive effect on their visual acceptability.
Ajzen I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process.50: 179–211.
Belluco S., Losasso C., Maggioletti M., Alonzi C. C., Paoletti M. G., and Ricci A. 2013. Edible Insects in a Food Safety and Nutritional Perspective: A Critical Review. Compr Rev Food Sci F. 12:296-313.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 Implementing Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down health rules as regards animal by-products and derived products not intended for human consumption and implementing Council Directive 97/78/EC as regards certain samples and items exempt from veterinary checks at the border under that Directive. OJ 54.
de Boer J., Schösler H., and Boersema, J.J. 2013. Motivational differences in food orientation and the choice of snacks made from lentils, locusts, seaweed or “hybrid” meat. Food Qual Prefer. 28(1): 32–35.
DeFoliart G. R. 1997. An overview of the role of edible insects in preserving biodiversity. Ecol Food Nutr. 36 (2–4): 109–132.
Deroy O., Reade B., and Spence C. 2015. The insectivore’s dilemma, and how to take the West out of it. Food Qual Prefer. 44: 44–55.
Dovey T. M., Staples P. A., Gibson E. L., and Halford J. C. G. 2008. Food neophobia and ‘picky/fussy’ eating in children: A review. Appetite. 50:181-193.
Hartmann C., Shi J., Giusto A., Siegrist M. 2015. The psychology of eating insects: A cross-cultural comparison between Germany and China. Food Qual Prefer. 44: 148-156.
Herz R. 2012. Let’s eat. In W.W. Norton & Co ed., That’s disgusting: unraveling the mysteries of repulsion. New York, USA.
Laureati M., Jabes D., Russo V., and Pagliarini. 2013. Sustainability and organic production: How information influences consumer’s expectation and preference for yogurt. Food Qual Prefer. 30 (1):1–8.
Laureati M., Bertoli S., Bergamaschi V., Lewandowski L., Giussani B., Battezzati A., and Pagliarini E. 2015. Food neophobia and liking for fruits and vegetables are not related to Italian children’s overweight. Food Qual Prefer. 40:125-131.
Laureati M., Bergamaschi V., and Pagliarini E. 2014. School-based intervention with children. Peer-modeling, reward and repeated exposure reduce food neophobia and increase liking of fruits and vegetables. Appetite. 83:26-32.
Laureati M., Bergamaschi V., and Pagliarini E. 2015. Assessing childhood food neophobia: Validation of a scale in Italian primary school children. Food Qual Prefer. 40:8-15.
Looy H., Dunkel F.V., and Wood J.R. 2014. How then shall we eat? Insect-eating attitudes and sustainable foodways. Agr Hum Values. 31(1):131-141.
Megido R. C., Sablon L., Geuens M., Brostaux Y., Alabi T., Blecker C., Drugmand D., Haubruge E., and Francis F.2014. Edible insects acceptance by Belgian consumers: Promising attitude for entomophagy development. J Sens Stud. 29:14–20.
Nakagaki B.J. and Defoliart G.R. 1991. Comparison of diets for mass-rearing Acheta domesticus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) as a novelty food, and comparison of food conversion efficiency with values reported for livestock. J Econ Entomol. 84(3):891–896.
Nonaka, K. (2009). Feasting on insects. Journal of Entomological Research. 39:304–312.
Olsen A., Kildegaard H., Gabrielsen G., Thybo A.K., and Møller P. 2012. Measuring children’s food preferences: using pictures in a computerized conjoint analysis. J Sens Stud. 27:264–276.
Oonincx D.G.A.B., van Itterbeeck J., Heetkamp M.J.W., van den Brand H., van Loon J.J.A, van Huis A. 2010. An exploration on greenhouse gas and ammonia production by insect species suitable for animal or human consumption. PLoS ONE 5(12):1-7.
Pliner P., and Hobden K. 1992. Development of a scale to measure the trait food neophobia. Appetite. 19: 105–120.
Pliner P., and Salvy, S. J. 2006. Food neophobia in humans. In R. Shepherd and M. Raats Ed., The Psychology of Food Choice (pp. 75–92). CABI, London.
Regulation (EC) No. 1069/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council, 2009. Laying down health rules as regards animal by-products and derived products not intended for human consumption and repealing Regulation (EC) No. 1774/2002 (Animal by-products Regulation). OJ 300.
Regulation (EC) No. 258/1997 of the European Parliament and of the Council. 1997. Novel food and novel food ingredients. OJ 258.
Regulation (EC) No. 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, 2001. Laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies. OJ 147.
Regulation (EC) No.178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council. 2002. General principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety. OJ 178.
Regulation (EC) No 2015/2283 of the European Parliament and of the Council, 2015 on novel foods, amending Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Regulation (EC) No 258/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1852/2001.
Rozin P. 2007. How does culture affect choice of foods? In H. MacFie Ed., Consumer-led food product development (pp. 66-78). Cambridge England: Woodhead Publishing Limited.
Rozin P., and Fallon A. 1987. A perspective on disgust. Psychol Rev. 94:23–41.
Rumpold B.A., and Schlüter O.K. 2013. Potential and challenges of insects as an innovative source for food and feed production. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. 17:1–11.
Rumpold B.A., and Schlüter O.K. 2013. Nutritional composition and safety aspects of edible insect. Mol Nutr Food Res. 57:802-823.
Sánchez-Muros M.J., Barroso F. G., and Manzano-Agugliaro, F. 2014. Insect meal as renewable source of food for animal feeding: a review. J Clean Prod. 65:16-27.
Schösler H., de Boer J., and Boersema J. 2012. Can we cut meat out of the dish? Constructing consumer-oriented pathways towards meat substitution. Appetite. 58:39–47.
Tan H.S.G., Fischer A.R.H, Tinchan P., Stieger M., Steenbekkers L.P.A., and van Trijp H.C.M. 2015. Insects as food: Exploring cultural exposure and individual experience as determinants of acceptance. Food Qual Prefer. 42:78–89.
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, 2013.
van Huis A. 2013. Potential of insects as food and feed in assuring food security. Annu Rev Entomol. 58(1):563–583.
van Huis A., Van Itterbeeck J., Klunder H., Mertens E., Halloran A., Muir G., and Vantomme P. 2013. Edible insects: Future prospects for food and feed security. FAO Forestry Paper 171. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. www.fao.org/docrep/018/i3253e/i3253e.pdf.
Vanhonacker F., Van Loo E.J., Gellynck X., and Verbeke W. 2013. Flemish consumer attitudes towards more sustainable food choices. Appetite. 62:7–16.
Verbeke W. 2015. Profiling consumers who are ready to adopt insects as a meat substitute in a Western society. Food Qual Prefer. 39:147–155.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright Agreement with Authors
Before publication, after the acceptance of the manuscript, Authors have to sign a Publication Agreement with "Italian Journal of Food Science", granting and assigning to "Italian Journal of Food Science" the perpetual right to distribute the work free of charge by any means and in any parts of the world, including the communication to the public through the journal website.
License for Published Contents